Enough Kiwi’s have been recruited by Muslims here and sent to their deaths overseas, and now this govt of NZ rewards foreign ISIS jihadi at the request of local islamics. She’d be a perfect bride for Mark John Taylor, another ISIS returnee who got away scot-free! Meanwhile, if you share a video and you’re a white guy – you’re jailed! It’s funny how Ardern is never too concerned about Kiwi children being cared for by their own parents the way welfare takes them away for smaller crimes than international terrorism! this isn’t the first time and wont be the last time that NZ rewards foreign ISIS jihadi!!
Aden, who has links to terrorist group Islamic State, is returning from Turkey with her two children after the government signed off on her so called “managed return”.
But there are no details of what that means or if any restrictions could be placed on her.
Aden has been in custody in Turkey since illegally trying to cross the border from Syria, with Turkish authorities identifying her as a terrorist.
She was a dual New Zealand-Australian citizen, having moved to Australia when she was six. But Australia rescinded her citizenship, meaning the only place she can legally live is New Zealand.
Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said today that the government had taken into account its international obligations and the fact children were involved.
The Islamic Women’s Council Anjum Rahman told Checkpoint that Aden’s identity could become known once she moved into a community. But Rahman hoped the public would give her a chance “to rebuild her life” and allow her children to grow up well and receive an education.
“That’s the best outcome for everyone. The more stress that she’s placed under and the more stress the children are placed under, the less the likelihood of a positive outcome.
“So, if we can make sure that she gets the support that she needs and the children are well cared for – then that’s the best for all of New Zealand.”
She said she expected the government would do its homework and offer the level of resourcing and expertise needed to ensure Aden was a “safe person”.
Rahman said as far as she knew Aden had not been charged with anything and while some people might be concerned over her arrival, she was a New Zealand citizen with nowhere else to go.
“Hopefully, even if we disagree, we can agree that we want everyone to be safe and we want everything done to ensure the best and most positive outcome here.”
It is the best option as the country had an obligation under international law to take her back.
Looking after her and her children would be mainly the government’s responsibility.
The government would also need to ensure the family would receive support, including from any school they attended.
She said her group had not been asked to help, and that was appropriate at this stage because they didn’t have the skills or resources for such a complex situation.
Professionals and experts needed to be involved and she was confident the government would honour its responsibility.
“We have made sure that our expectations around keeping the family safe, and all of New Zealand safe, are known.”
The Islamic Women’s Council had been talking to the police but are also aware that other agencies were involved.
Government has made a choice – Brownlee
National’s foreign affairs spokesperson Gerry Brownlee said Australia’s stance was unreasonable, but the New Zealand’s government’s decision showed the government did not have a high degree of concern for individual responsibility.
“I think you always have a choice,” he said. “You can’t really resile with the fact that this woman left Australia to join an organisation that wanted to destroy our way of life … that considered that the way in which we live in both New Zealand and Australia is somehow evil.”
He said it showed the government’s excuse that Aden could not be separated from her children did not stack up.
“Those children are victims of their parents’ decisions. We have organisations in New Zealand that regularly take children away from bad parents so … I don’t think the suggestion that there were family bonds there that could not be broken was reasonable.”
He thought it was “very poor” that the government would not give details about what kind of security arrangements would be in place, and the legal and operational security reasons given were “not good enough”.
“I think it’s just an excuse for not trusting the New Zealand public to know what they’re up to.”
Life-changing for Aden – analyst
However, defence policy analyst Paul Buchanan said New Zealand could not afford to refuse to take Aden in.
“Australia’s too big a partner on several levels. There are bigger fish to fry when it comes to international security and so we can’t turn what is essentially a bump in the road in our international relations into a full-fledged contest.
“The Australians reneged on their international obligations but … quite frankly we cannot if we are to maintain our reputation as a responsible international citizen.
Aden would likely be subject to a control order, and there would be good security measures in place, he said.
“Not that this woman, in first instance, poses a security threat other than perhaps with her speech.
“If she does in fact engage in any radical activity – let’s say such as trying to recruit other people or making jihadist pronouncements in public forums – then she will very likely be subject to prosecution.”
He said moving to New Zealand would be life changing for her.
“I think after the initial loneliness that she’ll experience in New Zealand following up on the trauma of her existence in the Middle East, she’ll come to embrace New Zealand and be thankful for what’s been extended to her when her adopted country, Australia, refused to do so.
“The New Zealand public needs to understand it wasn’t just about the mistakes this still very young mother made in her teenage years that led her to Syria. It is about two innocent children who had nothing to with the circumstances of their birth, who are by birthright New Zealand citizens, and deserve the full protections that New Zealand can offer them.”
By returning, she was also at risk of discrimination from Islamophobes in New Zealand, he said.
“There are other people in the community who don’t want her here and would choose to do her harm regardless of what she does when she comes back to these shores and regardless of the circumstances by which she came here.
“I wouldn’t want her address … to be released to the public. I would want the police to know that.”
Her return should be backed up by support from the relevant ministries and agencies, he said, and he hoped the Islamic Women’s Council would be asked to get involved.
New Zealand to bring in terror suspect Suhayra Aden and her children
New Zealand has agreed to repatriate Suhayra Aden and her two young children, who crossed from Syria into Turkey in February.
The trio were detained after illegally trying to enter Turkey from the Syrian border, with the Turkish Ministry identifying her as a terrorist belonging to Islamic State.
They have been in immigration detention in Turkey since.
In March, former justice minister Andrew Little said he expected, should Aden and her family be brought to New Zealand, that she would be not be detained, but instead, she would be”free subject to conditions” based on the 2019 Terrorism Suppression (Control Orders) Act.
However, that law also gives authorities the ability to pre-emptively track and monitor certain people, including if they pose a “real risk of engaging in terrorism-related activities”.
Aden was a dual New Zealand-Australia citizen and grew up in Australia, but Australia revoked her citizenship.
The action caused tension between New Zealand and Australia, with Ardern accusing Australia of “abdicating” its responsibility.
Under international law, children have a right to a nationality and – if possible – to know and be cared for by their parents.
In a statement, New Zealand Prime Minister Ardern said this meant New Zealand was required to take the family in because of obligations not to leave people stateless, particularly for the two children.
“They are not Turkey’s responsibility, and with Australia refusing to accept the family, that makes them our’s,” she said.
“I made very strong representations to Australia that she should be permitted to return there. Her family moved to Australia when she was six and she grew up there before departing for Syria in 2014, on an Australian passport. Unfortunately, Australia would not reverse the cancellation of citizenship,” Ardern said.
“New Zealand has not taken this step lightly. We have taken into account our international responsibilities as well as the details of this particular case, including the fact that children are involved.”
Speaking in Northland this afternoon, she said she did not accept the explanations from Australian officials and leadership of why Aden would not be allowed to return there.
“I just don’t accept it,” she said. “Our view was that Australia did have obligations here,” she said.
“Everyone will absolutely know the frustration that we’ve had over Australia’s decision to revoke the citizenship of someone we believe ultimately was Australia’s responsibility.
She said agreeing to a managed return was “the right step in this case”, but any future cases would be looked at on a case-by-case basis.
“In this case the welfare and best interests of the children has been a primary concern.”
Australia had made commitments it would not do so again, she said.
“We have been given an assurance from Australia that we will not have another situation where a … dual citizen[ship] Australia, New Zealand will not be arbitrarily cancelled in this way again.”
Asked whether Australia had breached its obligations under the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, she said that was a question for Australia.
Police and several other agencies had been involved in planning to bring the family to New Zealand, Ardern said.
She gave “absolute assurances” that all the tools available to ensure the safety of New Zealanders had been used.
“Let me be clear, the choice of not accepting a repatriation could well have led … Turkey to have the person shipped back to New Zealand without any safety contingency. That would not have been right for us, or for the children involved.”
“I can assure people great care is being taken as to how the woman and her young children are returned to New Zealand and how they will be managed in a way that minimises any risk for New Zealanders.”
The Prime Minister’s Office said details about the family’s relocation to New Zealand would not be made public, including security arrangements for legal and operational reasons.
Ardern said services to support reintegration was a concern, as well as security. Any investigation over links to a terrorist group would be a matter for police, she said.