Not many Muslims have read the Quran or Hadiths, but JK Sheindlin has.
This book has inspired many online spoofs, here is just one.
The People vs Muhammad – Psychological Analysis
In ‘The People vs Muhammad’, #1 international bestselling author JK Sheindlin psychologically analyses the founding father of Islam, while putting him on trial for crimes against humanity.
“Read with great interest and was very impressed by the level of research committed to the project.”- Katie Hopkins Productions, Radio DJ for LBC UK
“J.K Sheindlin has done something incredible!”- WND Online News
Is Islam a “religion of peace”? Was Muhammad the true and final prophet of God? Is the Quran the fulfilment of the Bible, and legitimately continuing the traditions of the Judeo-Christian scriptures? Perhaps one of the most audacious, shocking, unthinkable and highly controversial ideas to ever be conceived, The People vs Muhammad places the founding father of Islam on trial for crimes against humanity, and to challenge his self-proclaimed authority. With the growing threat of home-grown Muslim jihadist terrorist attacks and the ominous cataclysm of a global holy war, there’s no doubt Islam has become a burdensome issue which has our own western governments perplexed.
This book series intends to investigate the true ideology of Islam, to ascertain with reason and logic the legitimacy of Muhammad’s claim and core teachings of his cult. Throughout this series, author J.K Sheindlin carefully analyses the Quran and the Islamic texts legalistically to expose the shocking truth pertaining to Muhammad’s advocation for: Pedophilia, honor killings, sex slavery, prostitution, racism, extortion, murder, psychological indoctrination, intellectual terrorism, censorship, grand larceny, racketeering, domestic violence, gender inequality, and much more!
In this powerful series, the first installment Psychological analysis delves deep into Muhammad’s past and uncovers disturbing facts which undoubtedly prove to be the origins of his multiple psychopathological disorders. Using entirely the Islamic sources in reference to contemporary psychiatric-medical archives, J.K Sheindlin details Muhammad’s extensive catalogue of mental illnesses which include: Psychopathy, Gynophobia, Napoleon Complex, Schizophrenia, Narcissistic Personality Disorder, Messiah-God Complex, Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, Athazagorophobia, Oedipus Complex, Sex-addiction, Pedophilia, and Necrophilia. Furthermore, the author also hypothesizes a convincing argument based on medical science, which debunks Muhammad’s first revelation. These external factors being: Volcanic gas inhalation, sensory deprivation, starvation, dehydration, brain damage and Syphilis. Written to provoke a rational response from both Muslim and western readers, the verdict is ultimately decided by the public to determine if Muhammad’s claim to prophethood is legitimate.
You can buy the book on Amazon here: The People vs Muhammad – Psychological Analysis
The video is a deception and discredits MEMRI TV, a very reputable organisation. Snopes points out that the ranter is Egyptian opposition activist Ihab Al-Khouli, railing against the actions of Mohamed Morsi. The translation over-writes the original.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/arab-guy-renouncing-faith-television/
Snoops isn’t exactly a reliable source of information considering it has been paid for by the democratic party of the USA
Nonetheless, Snopes (not Snoops) is correct in its reporting of this incident, and this deserves a correction given that the original post was false. Credibility and factual correctness are hugely important for ISWNZ, for MEMRI, for Snopes, and for anyone taking a contrarian stand, particularly with Islam given its doctrines of deception. Snopes operates on donations from anyone sympathetic to its aims, of uncovering the truth behind rumour. It itself shows that, like the BBC, gets brickbats from both the Left and the Right, so it must have a balanced outlook. Check your sources, too, its manager is a registered Republican. ISWNZ must be very careful who and how it criticises, given it’s on a knife-edge of public credibility itself.
Chris Slater (Dyspeptic Lucubrations)